Moving build-in bean for Principal to Java EE Security?

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Moving build-in bean for Principal to Java EE Security?

arjan tijms
Hi,

I wonder, wouldn't it be a good idea to let JSR 375 take ownership of the build-in bean in the Java EE part of CDI for Principal? 

The CDI spec proposed to the servlet spec to take ownership of the build-in beans for the Servlet owned artefacts (such as HttpServletRequest) before.

Kind regards
Arjan Tijms

_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Moving build-in bean for Principal to Java EE Security?

arjan tijms
Hi,

Just a small ping ;)

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms

On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:59 PM, arjan tijms <[hidden email]> wrote:
Hi,

I wonder, wouldn't it be a good idea to let JSR 375 take ownership of the build-in bean in the Java EE part of CDI for Principal? 

The CDI spec proposed to the servlet spec to take ownership of the build-in beans for the Servlet owned artefacts (such as HttpServletRequest) before.

Kind regards
Arjan Tijms


_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Moving build-in bean for Principal to Java EE Security?

Martin Kouba
+1

Is there a spec issue?

Martin

Dne 27.9.2017 v 20:36 arjan tijms napsal(a):

> Hi,
>
> Just a small ping ;)
>
> Kind regards,
> Arjan Tijms
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 7:59 PM, arjan tijms <[hidden email]
> <mailto:[hidden email]>> wrote:
>
>     Hi,
>
>     I wonder, wouldn't it be a good idea to let JSR 375 take ownership
>     of the build-in bean in the Java EE part of CDI for Principal?
>
>     The CDI spec proposed to the servlet spec to take ownership of the
>     build-inbeans for the Servlet owned artefacts (such as
>     HttpServletRequest) before.
>
>     Kind regards
>     Arjan Tijms
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>

--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev

Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.